PawLineMoth & MarmaladeBY PAWLINE

READ THE EVIDENCE AT ITS OWN SCALE

Sources, not decorations.

These sources inform specific explanations. They did not review or endorse this website. A welfare article is not the same as an experiment. A government procedure is limited to its jurisdiction.

Saito et al. / Scientific Reports (2019)

Recorded-word discrimination; not name rankings or response guarantees

Open source ↗

Author Correction / Scientific Reports (2019)

Corrected subject ages, household counts and participant overlap

Open source ↗

University of Tokyo (2019)

Orienting response and non-response limits; primary paper controls

Open source ↗

Cats Protection / Renaming (2025)

Positive, consistent approach and record updates; not universal emotional claims

Open source ↗

Cats Protection / Name response (2018)

Further reading only; no reproduced ladder or all-circumstances guarantee

Open source ↗

Blue Cross / Microchipping (reviewed July 2026)

Explains the microchip number, database and contact details; no UK-wide legal claim here

Open source ↗

Japan / Official microchip registration portal

Japan-specific owner and contact procedures, not a worldwide process

Open source ↗

Service NSW / Pet transfer

NSW-specific transfer guidance, not a worldwide process

Open source ↗

Cats Protection / UK survey (2014)

A dated UK sample, not present-day global popularity

Open source ↗

PawLine app ↗